A Secret Weapon For rule of merger criminal case law pakistan
A Secret Weapon For rule of merger criminal case law pakistan
Blog Article
refers to some landmark case decided via the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. Listed here’s a brief overview:
one hundred and one . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Matter: Appeal At times it's convenient for any Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to make an attempt to eliminate a case on merit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's got achieved to the stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for benefit disposal when it has arrived at these stage. Read more
Intentional Murder: The important thing component of Section 302 PPC may be the need of intention. It indicates that the offender must have the intention to cause the death with the sufferer. Intent may be premeditated or is often formed in the intervening time of the crime.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Provided the legal analysis on the topic issue, we are on the view that the claim of your petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Preliminary contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle just isn't legally sound, Apart from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, they are subject matter to rules and regulations In case the recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case on the petitioners for promotion might be viewed as, however, we have been crystal clear inside our point of view that contractual service cannot be thought of for seniority and promotion given that the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Exercise, topic to availability of vacancy matter on the approval on the competent authority.
ninety four . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's perfectly-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 times. In case the appeal is just not decided within that timeframe, he/she can then tactic the service tribunal to challenge the original order. read more Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as being the 90 days for that department to act has already expired. Within the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided through the decision with the Supreme Court inside the case of Dr.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, It is usually a perfectly-established proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is issue to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.
be founded without an iota of doubt in all other jurisdictions) will be inferred. This is usually a horrifying reality, an extremely small threshold for an offence that carries capital punishment.
48 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice from the Peace u/s 22-A is just not obliged to afford an opportunity of hearing on the accused party; nor obliged to always or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is required to look at all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid equipment of criminal legislation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a few of the relevant factors. Read more
9. Needless to mention that any observations made in the above order are tentative in nature and shall not influence the trial Court.
acquitted the appellants from every one of the charges therefore the same is dismissed being infructuous. (Criminal Revision )
How much sway case law holds might differ by jurisdiction, and by the exact circumstances on the current case. To explore this concept, consider the following case law definition.
This article delves into the intricacies of the recent amendment, accompanied by relevant case regulation, to supply an extensive understanding of its implications and useful applications.
However, it’s essential to note that the application on the death penalty is topic to several legal safeguards and due process to ensure fair trials.
These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory regulation, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory legislation, which are founded by executive businesses based on statutes.